jack's seclusion.
19:52
Advertisement for the Waldorf-Astoria - Langston Hughes

crueluncle:

Fine living … a la carte?
    Come to the Waldorf-Astoria!

    LISTEN HUNGRY ONES!
Look! See what Vanity Fair says about the
    new Waldorf-Astoria:

    “All the luxuries of private home… .”
Now, won’t that be charming when the last flop-house
    has turned you down this winter?
    Furthermore:
“It is far beyond anything hitherto attempted in the hotel
    world… .” It cost twenty-eight million dollars. The fa-
    mous Oscar Tschirky is in charge of banqueting.
    Alexandre Gastaud is chef. It will be a distinguished
    background for society.
So when you’ve no place else to go, homeless and hungry
    ones, choose the Waldorf as a background for your rags—
(Or do you still consider the subway after midnight good
    enough?)

        ROOMERS
Take a room at the new Waldorf, you down-and-outers—
    sleepers in charity’s flop-houses where God pulls a
    long face, and you have to pray to get a bed.
They serve swell board at the Waldorf-Astoria. Look at the menu, will 
you:

    GUMBO CREOLE
    CRABMEAT IN CASSOLETTE
    BOILED BRISKET OF BEEF
    SMALL ONIONS IN CREAM
    WATERCRESS SALAD
    PEACH MELBA

Have luncheon there this afternoon, all you jobless.
    Why not?
Dine with some of the men and women who got rich off of
    your labor, who clip coupons with clean white fingers
    because your hands dug coal, drilled stone, sewed gar-
    ments, poured steel to let other people draw dividends
    and live easy.
(Or haven’t you had enough yet of the soup-lines and the bit-
    ter bread of charity?)
Walk through Peacock Alley tonight before dinner, and get
    warm, anyway. You’ve got nothing else to do.

EVICTED FAMILIES
All you families put out in the street:
    Apartments in the towers are only $10,000 a year.
(Three rooms and two baths.) Move in there until
times get good, and you can do better. $10,000 and $1.00
are about the same to you, aren’t they?
    Who cares about money with a wife and kids homeless, and
nobody in the family working? Wouldn’t a duplex
high above the street be grand, with a view of the rich-
est city in the world at your nose?
    “A lease, if you prefer, or an arrangement terminable at will.”

NEGROES
Oh, Lawd. I done forgot Harlem!
Say, you colored folks, hungry a long time in 135th Street——
    they got swell music at the Waldorf-Astoria. It sure is a 
    mighty nice place to shake hips in, too. There’s dancing
    after supper in a big warm room. It’s cold as hell
    on Lenox Avenue. All you’ve had all day is a cup of 
    coffee. Your pawnshop overcoat’s a ragged banner on
    your hungry frame. You know, downtown folks are just
    crazy about Paul R0beson! Maybe they’ll like you, too,
    black mob from Harlme. Drop in at the Waldorf this
    afternoon for tea. Stay to dinner. Give Park Avenue a
    lot of darkie color——free for nothing! Ask the Junior
    Leaguers to sing a spiritual for you. They probably
    know ‘em better than you do——and their lips won’t be
    so chapped with cold after they step out of their closed 
    cars in the undercover driveways.
Hallelujah! Undercover driveways!
Ma soul’s a witness for de Waldorf-Astoria!
(A thousand nigger section-hands keep the roadbeds smooth,
    so investments in railroads pay ladies with diamond
    necklaces staring at Sert murals.)
  Thank God A-mighty!
(And a million niggers bend their backs on rubber planta-
    tions, for rich behinds to ride on thick tires to the
    Theatre Guild tonight.)
Ma soul’s a witness!
(And here we stand, shivering in the cold, in Harlem.)
        Glory be to God——
De Waldorf-Astoria’s open!

EVERYBODY
So get proud and rare back; everybody! The new Waldorf-Astoria’s
    open!
(Special siding for private cars from the railroad yards.)
    You ain’t been there yet?
(A thousand miles of carpet and a million bathrooms.)
    Whats the matter?
You haven’t seen the ads in the papers? Didn’t you get a card?
    Don’t you know they specialize in American cooking?
    Ankle on down to 49th Street at Park Avenue. Get up
    off that subway bench tonight with the evening POST
    for cover! Come on out o’ that flop-house! Stop shivering
    your guts out all day on street corners under the El.
Jesus, ain’t you tired yet?

CHRISTMAS CARD
Hail Mary, Mother of God!
    the new Christ child of the Revolution’s about to be
    born.
(Kick hard, red baby, in the bitter womb of the mob.)
Somebody, put an ad in Vanity Fair quick!
Call Oscar of the Waldorf——for Christ’s sake!!
    It’s almost Christmas, and that little girl——turned whore
    because her belly was too hungry to stand it anymore——
    wants a nice clean bed for the Immaculate Conception.
Listen, Mary, Mother of God, wrap your new born babe in
    the red flag of Revolution: the Waldorf-Astoria’s the
    best manger we’ve got. For reservations: Telephone EL.
    5-3000.

00:09

Caterpillar crawled
Tiny little thing

Antlered the branch shook
Along with the wind

Pop called it natural
Ma called it sin

10:32 slantedshanty:

Frank O’Hara
10:24"The human is understood differentially depending on its race, the legibility of that race, its morphology,
the recognizability of that morphology, its sex, the perceptual verifiability of that sex, its ethnicity, the categorical understanding of that
ethnicity." — http://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/butler-undoing_gender.pdf
10:18"The Hegelian tradition links desire with recognition, claiming that
desire is always a desire for recognition and that it is only through the
experience of recognition that any of us becomes constituted as socially
viable beings. That view has its allure and its truth, but it also misses
a couple of important points. The terms by which we are recognized
as human are socially articulated and changeable. And sometimes the
very terms that confer “humanness” on some individuals are those that
deprive certain other individuals of the possibility of achieving that status,
producing a differential between the human and the less-than-human." — http://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/butler-undoing_gender.pdf
10:16"If gender is a kind of a doing, an incessant activity performed, in
part, without one’s knowing and without one’s willing, it is not for
that reason automatic or mechanical. On the contrary, it is a practice
of improvisation within a scene of constraint. Moreover, one does not
“do” one’s gender alone. One is always “doing” with or for another,
even if the other is only imaginary. What I call my “own” gender
appears perhaps at times as something that I author or, indeed, own.
But the terms that make up one’s own gender are, from the start, outside oneself, beyond oneself in a sociality that has no single author
(and that radically contests the notion of authorship itself)." — http://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/butler-undoing_gender.pdf
12:45"The superficial opposition between pleasure and duty is overcome in two different ways. Totalitarian power goes even further than traditional authoritarian power. What it says, in effect, is not, ‘Do your duty, I don’t care whether you like it or not,’ but: ‘You must do your duty, and you must enjoy doing it.’ (This is how totalitarian democracy works: it is not enough for the people to follow their leader, they must love him.) Duty becomes pleasure. Second, there is the obverse paradox of pleasure becoming duty in a ‘permissive’ society. Subjects experience the need to ‘have a good time’, to enjoy themselves, as a kind of duty, and, consequently, feel guilty for failing to be happy. The superego controls the zone in which these two opposites overlap – in which the command to enjoy doing your duty coincides with the duty to enjoy yourself." — Slavoj Žižek · ‘You May!’: the post-modern superego · LRB 18 March 1999
12:43"A good illustration of the way the ‘totalitarian’ master operates is provided by the logo on the wrapper around German fat-free salami. ‘Du darfst!’ it says – ‘You may!’ The new fundamentalisms are not a reaction against the anxiety of excessive freedom that accompanies liberal late capitalism; they do not provide strong prohibitions in a society awash with permissiveness. The cliché about ‘escaping from freedom’ into a totalitarian haven is profoundly misleading. Nor is an explanation found in the standard Freudo-Marxian thesis according to which the libidinal foundation of totalitarian (fascist) regimes is the ‘authoritarian personality’ – i.e. someone who finds satisfaction in compulsive obedience. Although, on the surface, the totalitarian master also issues stern orders compelling us to renounce pleasure and to sacrifice ourselves in some higher cause, his effective injunction, discernible between the lines, is a call to unconstrained transgression. Far from imposing on us a firm set of standards to be complied with, the totalitarian master suspends (moral) punishment. His secret injunction is: ‘You may.’ He tells us that the prohibitions which regulate social life and guarantee a minimum of decency are worthless, just a device to keep the common people at bay – we, on the other hand, are free to let ourselves go, to kill, rape, plunder, but only insofar as we follow the master. (The Frankfurt School discerned this key feature of totalitarianism in its theory of repressive desublimation.) Obedience to the master allows you to transgress everyday moral rules: all the dirty things you were dreaming of, everything you had to renounce when you subordinated yourself to the traditional, patriarchal, symbolic Law you are now allowed to indulge in without punishment, just as you may eat fat-free salami without any risk to your health." — Slavoj Žižek · ‘You May!’: the post-modern superego · LRB 18 March 1999
12:29"But New Age wisdom, too, relies on the superego imperative: ‘It is your duty to achieve full self-realisation and self-fulfilment, because you can.’ Isn’t this why we often feel that we are being terrorised by the New Age language of liberation?" — Slavoj Žižek · ‘You May!’: the post-modern superego · LRB 18 March 1999
11:48"For psychoanalysis, the perversion of the human libidinal economy is what follows from the prohibition of some pleasurable activity: not a life led in strict obedience to the law and deprived of all pleasure but a life in which exercising the law provides a pleasure of its own, a life in which performance of the ritual destined to keep illicit temptation at bay becomes the source of libidinal satisfaction." — Slavoj Žižek · ‘You May!’: the post-modern superego · LRB 18 March 1999